Tag: Kyoto University

  • [Science] Mitochondrial DNA May Decide Whether Dying Cancer Cells Alert the Immune System

    [Science] Mitochondrial DNA May Decide Whether Dying Cancer Cells Alert the Immune System

    Whether a dying cancer cell wakes up the immune system may depend on how much mitochondrial DNA it carries. A Japanese research team reports that cancer cells carrying KRAS mutations tend to accumulate mitochondrial DNA, and that a combination of drugs can make such cells die in a way that alerts the immune system. So far this has been shown only in cell experiments and mice, not in patients.

    原論文情報 / Original Paper
    Title: Mitochondrial DNA abundance is a determinant of immunogenic cell death in cancer
    Authors: Kosuke Tanaka, Yasuki Adachi, et al.
    Journal: Immunity (2026)
    DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2026.10.002

    Why the way a cancer cell dies matters

    Many cancer drugs work by killing tumor cells, but cells can die in different ways. In apoptosis, an orderly form of cell death, dead cells are generally cleared away without a strong immune response. Some deaths, however, alert the immune system. Researchers call this immunogenic cell death: the dying cells release signals that help immune cells recognize tumor material and go after surviving cancer cells. A widely cited 2020 consensus paper describes it as death that provides enough “antigenicity and adjuvanticity”, roughly, enough recognizable tumor antigens and enough additional signals to activate an immune response.

    This matters for treatment. Targeted drugs that block a specific faulty molecule in a tumor often work well at first, but cancers can resist them or relapse. Pairing them with immune checkpoint inhibitors, drugs that release the brakes on immune cells, is an attractive idea. Whether the pairing works may depend on whether the targeted drug makes cancer cells die in a way the immune system can see, and what decides that has been poorly understood. The researchers therefore asked whether something inside the cancer cell itself could tip the balance. Their attention turned to mitochondria, the structures that produce energy for the cell.

    KRAS-mutant cancers hoard mitochondrial DNA

    Mitochondria carry a small loop of their own DNA, called mtDNA. When mtDNA leaks into the main body of the cell, a protein called cGAS detects it and activates another protein, STING. This cGAS-STING pathway triggers the production of type I interferons, immune signaling proteins that help alert the body’s defenses.

    The team first mined public databases of cancer cell lines. Whether a line carried a KRAS mutation tracked its mtDNA level more closely than the type of cancer did, and lung, colorectal, pancreatic and biliary cancers with KRAS mutations tended to hold more mtDNA. According to the researchers, KRAS mutations increase reactive oxygen species (ROS), chemically reactive molecules that can damage cell components, and these also promote the copying of mtDNA. Such cancers are common: the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s RAS Initiative estimates that mutations in the RAS gene family, which includes KRAS, are found in roughly a third of human cancers, including about 95 percent of pancreatic cancers, 45 percent of colorectal cancers and 35 percent of lung cancers.

    Bar chart of approximate shares of cancers with RAS gene mutations: pancreatic 95%, colorectal 45%, lung 35%, AML 15%, melanoma 15%, bladder 10%
    Source: NCI Frederick, RAS Initiative (approximate figures). RAS is the gene family that includes KRAS.

    Letting the DNA out, then removing the brake

    In KRAS-mutant cells, a drug that blocks MEK, a protein in the same growth-signaling chain as KRAS, made mtDNA escape into the cytoplasm. But the drug also switched on mitophagy, the cell’s routine for clearing out damaged mitochondria, which limited the leak. The team found that this cleanup involved a protein called PRKN, which helps remove damaged mitochondria and thereby holds back the release of mtDNA.

    The two drugs thus work in opposite ways: one causes mitochondrial damage and releases mtDNA, while the other stops the cell from cleaning up. When the researchers added chloroquine, which they used experimentally to inhibit mitophagy, damaged mitochondria were no longer cleared as effectively, mtDNA kept escaping, and the type I interferon response grew stronger. The response did not appear in cells with little mtDNA or in cells lacking STING. Across human cancers, the team also noted that higher PRKN expression went along with less immune-cell infiltration.

    Schematic of MEK inhibition plus a mitophagy block causing mtDNA leakage, cGAS-STING signaling and an immune attack on the tumor
    Schematic based on the press release; not to scale. Preclinical (cells and mice).

    A balance with cytochrome c

    There was a second ingredient. Cytochrome c is a protein normally involved in energy production inside mitochondria; when released into the cell, it helps trigger the machinery of apoptosis. The researchers found that the relative amounts of mtDNA and cytochrome c help determine whether drug-treated cells undergo apoptosis or immunogenic cell death.

    In lung cancer cells with a lot of mtDNA, such as those with KRAS mutations or ALK or ROS1 gene fusions, the drug combination produced an immune response. In EGFR-mutant lung cancer cells, which carry a lot of cytochrome c, cells mainly died by apoptosis, and lowering cytochrome c shifted them toward immunogenic death. Pushing the drugs too hard also favored apoptosis and weakened the immune response, a hint that simply killing more cancer cells is not always the better goal.

    What happened in mice

    In a mouse model of KRAS-mutant colorectal cancer, the team combined a MEK inhibitor, a mitophagy inhibitor and an anti-PD-1 antibody, a type of checkpoint inhibitor. The three-drug combination suppressed tumor growth, and tumors disappeared in 2 of 12 mice. The effect depended on dendritic cells, which show tumor fragments to other immune cells, and on CD8-positive T cells, the immune system’s cancer-killing cells. Tumors with low mtDNA did not respond. These results show an effect in a preclinical model; whether the same strategy can work in patients remains unknown.

    The findings suggest that successful cancer treatment may depend not only on how many cancer cells are killed, but also on how their deaths affect the immune system. According to the press release, the team’s next steps are to test whether mtDNA abundance can predict how patients respond to treatment and to develop strategies that combine targeted drugs with immunotherapy. The work was supported in part by Japan’s AMED and the Moonshot R&D Program.

    Xsciens Editorial Note

    The study suggests that how much mitochondrial DNA a tumor carries helps decide whether drug-induced cell death rouses the immune system.

    • Observation versus model. What was observed: KRAS mutation tracked mtDNA levels in public cell-line data, and the drug combination caused mtDNA leakage and interferon signaling in cells. The mtDNA-versus-cytochrome c “balance” is the team’s explanation, built from experiments in which those molecules were manipulated in cells. The 2-of-12 figure counts complete tumor disappearance in mice, not an overall response rate.
    • Limits. The evidence comes from cell experiments, analyses of public cancer databases and mouse models. Although the researchers looked at patterns in human cancers, they have not shown that the drug combination works in patients. Chloroquine was an experimental tool to inhibit mitophagy, not a validated cancer treatment, and nothing here supports anyone taking it for cancer.
    • What to watch. Whether mtDNA abundance can predict treatment response in patients, and whether it must be read alongside cytochrome c levels and other features of the tumor environment. The team says this still needs testing.
    • From the editors — if this holds up, cancer care could get smarter about how tumors die, not just whether they do. Doctors might one day check a tumor’s mitochondrial DNA to pick drugs that leave the immune system alert to any survivors, which could mean fewer relapses. But all of this rests on cells and mice so far, and pushing a tumor too hard can backfire, as this very study shows. If you or someone close is in treatment, keep an eye on this field, but treat no single drug as the answer.

    References for this note: Galluzzi et al., Consensus guidelines for the definition, detection and interpretation of immunogenic cell death (J Immunother Cancer, 2020), NCI Frederick, RAS Initiative, Lin et al., Editorial: Mitochondrial damage interacts with the immune system and tumor microenvironment (Front Immunol, 2025)

    Sources: Immunity (Tanaka et al., 2026), Nagoya University / National Cancer Center Japan / Kyoto University press release (Nov 2, 2026, in Japanese), Kyoto University research news (in Japanese)

  • Turning Air Into Ammonia, More Gently — Kyoto University Team Explains Why a Molybdenum Catalyst Works

    Ammonia is the backbone of the world’s food supply as the raw material for fertilizer, but making it burns a staggering amount of energy worldwide. A research team including Kyoto University’s Fukui Institute for Fundamental Chemistry has now worked out the previously unknown mechanism behind a molecular catalyst that converts nitrogen gas (N2) — abundant in the air around us — into ammonia under comparatively mild conditions.

    A Process That Eats 1-2% of the World’s Energy

    Today, almost all industrial ammonia comes from the Haber-Bosch process, which forces nitrogen and hydrogen to react at roughly 400–500°C and hundreds of atmospheres of pressure. Because the hydrogen feedstock is mostly made from natural gas, the process comes with heavy CO2 emissions. Global ammonia production is estimated to account for something like 1–2% of the world’s total energy consumption, and chemists have long sought a way to fix nitrogen under gentler conditions.

    Turning Water Into a “Powerful Hydrogen Carrier”

    The team focused on a reaction system that pairs a molybdenum (Mo) molecular catalyst with samarium diiodide (SmI2) and water. Normally, breaking water’s O-H bond to hand off a hydrogen — in chemical terms, a proton and an electron delivered together in a process called proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) — takes a large amount of energy. But through theoretical calculations, the team found that when water binds to a samarium ion to form the complex [SmI(H2O)(thf)5]I, that O-H bond’s dissociation free energy drops dramatically.

    The O-H bond dissociation free energy of a free water molecule is 107.2 kcal/mol, but inside the samarium complex it falls to 36.1 kcal/mol — down to roughly a third, by calculation.
    Bar chart comparing O-H bond dissociation free energy of free water versus water in the samarium complex
    Figure: O-H bond dissociation free energy (BDFE) of water, free vs. bound in the samarium complex — 107.2 kcal/mol down to 36.1 kcal/mol. Source: Nakamura et al., Nature Communications 17, 9927 (2026)

    Mapping the Reaction Pathway for the First Time

    Combining experiments with theoretical calculations, the team also worked out the step-by-step pathway by which nitrogen on the molybdenum center transforms — from nitride (Mo≡N) to imide (Mo=NH) to amide (Mo-NH2) and finally to an ammonia complex. The step demanding the most energy, by calculation, was imide formation, with an activation free energy of 5.1 kcal/mol. Structural models corresponding to the imide and amide species — related compounds carrying a methyl group on nitrogen — were actually isolated and had their structures determined.

    Why It Matters

    With the reaction mechanism now mapped out, the team has a design roadmap for improving the catalyst further. A related molecular catalyst the same team has previously developed has produced as many as 60,000 equivalents of ammonia per molybdenum atom, and the new mechanistic insight is expected to feed into next-generation nitrogen-fixation technology. The findings were published in Nature Communications on September 24, 2026.

    Comparison table of the Haber–Bosch process and the molybdenum molecular catalyst: conditions, hydrogen source, track record and open issues
    Comparison of the industrial process and this catalyst (compiled by Xsciens from Kyoto University’s announcement, the paper and a review).

    The Team and Where This Work Fits

    The research was carried out by Kazunari Yoshizawa of Kyoto University’s Fukui Institute for Fundamental Chemistry (professor emeritus at Kyushu University), Professor Yoshiaki Nishibayashi of the University of Tokyo’s Graduate School of Engineering, Professor Hiromasa Tanaka of Daido University, and Assistant Professor Taiji Nakamura of Kyoto Institute of Technology, among others. Nishibayashi’s group had earlier reported that a molybdenum molecular catalyst can make ammonia from nitrogen and water at ordinary temperature and pressure (the reaction system also uses samarium diiodide). This time the team tackled the question of why that reaction proceeds.

    Experiments and Calculations Working Together

    The team isolated reaction intermediates, the species formed partway through the reaction, as stable compounds and confirmed their structures, which backed the proposed pathway experimentally. They also used quantum chemical calculations (computer methods that predict how molecules behave from quantum mechanics) to examine steps that are hard to observe directly, confirming the structure of the samarium diiodide and water complex and the important role of proton-coupled electron transfer in forming ammonia. According to Kyoto University, the hardest step in the whole reaction is the one that forms the imide.

    Hurdles Before Practical Use

    The result is an understanding of how the reaction works, and it does not by itself become an industrial production method. Using this understanding as a clue, the group aims to develop high-performance catalysts that make ammonia with less energy. It also says that sustainable ammonia production needs not only better catalysts but also work on reaction conditions to enable renewable energy use and lower production costs.

    According to Kyoto University, this result is part of the outcomes of NEDO’s Green Innovation Fund project (with Idemitsu Kosan as lead company). The same fund also includes a project to build a supply chain for ammonia as a fuel, such as demonstrations of technology to co-fire ammonia at 50% or more in the boilers of commercial coal-fired power plants (fiscal 2021 to 2028). That co-firing work is a separate theme from the catalytic mechanism studied here. Ammonia is attracting attention not only as a fertilizer ingredient but also as a medium for carrying and storing hydrogen and as a fuel.

    Xsciens Editorial Note

    The value of this study is not that ammonia has become cheaper to make. It is that we now know why the catalyst works.

    • What was shown. The mechanism by which water’s O–H bond is weakened to hand hydrogen to the catalyst, and the intermediate steps by which nitrogen becomes ammonia, were supported by both experiments and calculations.
    • What is still open. The reaction needs samarium iodide as a reductant. A review (Smith et al., 2020) points out that for metal-complex routes, the energy needed for the reducing agent and proton source tends to be much larger than for conventional Haber–Bosch, so how the reductant is regenerated or reduced will likely be the key to practical use.
    • A caution when reading. “Mild conditions” refers to the laboratory; it does not mean a giant plant can be replaced. A comparison only means something once scale, cost and emissions are taken into account.
    • Our imagination (speculation) — We wonder whether this work might not change fertilizer prices soon, but add “one more map” for catalyst designers. It could, for example, help researchers imagine small units that make fertilizer in places where a large factory is hard to build, such as remote islands or rural areas. This is only our speculation, and it depends on solving catalyst durability and the reductant problem.

    References for this note: Smith, Hill & Torrente-Murciano, “Current and future role of Haber–Bosch ammonia in a carbon-free energy landscape”, Energy & Environmental Science 13, 331–344 (2020)

    Sources

    Kyoto University, “Catalytic mechanism of next-generation ammonia synthesis method elucidated”
    Nakamura et al., “Unveiling full mechanistic picture of Mo-catalysed nitrogen fixation driven by SmI2–H2O system,” Nature Communications 17, 9927 (2026)