Tag: Astronomy

  • [Science] Possible New Dwarf Planet Beyond Pluto Found in Rubin Observatory Data

    [Science] Possible New Dwarf Planet Beyond Pluto Found in Rubin Observatory Data

    Astronomers using data from the Vera C. Rubin Observatory have identified an object called 2026 ED138, currently about 46 times farther from the Sun than Earth is and perhaps 600 to 1,500 kilometers across — large enough that it may qualify as the solar system’s sixth dwarf planet. It matters because it shows that sizable worlds can still hide in the outer solar system, and that new survey data and search software are now able to dig them out.

    原論文情報 / Original Paper
    Announcement: Possible new dwarf planet 2026 ED138 (provisional designation)
    Announced by: NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory / NOIRLab, October 27, 2026
    Discoverer: Matthew Holman, Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian
    Peer-reviewed paper: none cited in the coverage we checked. Source: University of Washington News

    What the team found

    The object carries the provisional name 2026 ED138. It was first identified on the evening of October 13, 2026, by astronomer Matthew Holman of the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard & Smithsonian, who was sifting through images that the NSF–DOE Vera C. Rubin Observatory had collected earlier this year; the University of Washington describes that data as preliminary. The object had been photographed before, but never recognized as a single moving body. Holman developed the search code together with colleague Kevin Napier. It links billions of detections of moving objects to work out which ones belong to the same body. Holman has described his first reaction as “excited disbelief,” and he immediately checked whether he or the code had made a mistake.

    Once the candidate was in hand, more data fell into place. According to Space.com and Universe Today, Rubin’s telescope recorded it 30 times on 20 nights between March 4 and July 11, 2026. Mario Jurić of the University of Washington, who leads Rubin’s solar system team, turned up additional detections in the catalog. Archival images from other surveys, including the Dark Energy Camera on a 4-meter telescope in Chile, extend the record back to 2016. That gives the team more than a decade of positions from which to calculate the orbit.

    Where it was hiding

    ED138 is currently about 46 astronomical units from the Sun (one astronomical unit is the Earth–Sun distance), compared with about 40 for Pluto on average. Its orbit is tilted roughly 25 degrees from the plane in which the planets travel, a tilt Space.com says likely stems from a gravitational interaction with Neptune. Universe Today describes it as a “hot classical” object, a label for icy Kuiper belt bodies on more tilted, disturbed orbits.

    The location also helps explain why it was missed. ED138 lies in a region near the plane of our own galaxy, where the Milky Way’s dense star field makes faint, slowly moving dots hard to pick out. The University of Washington’s write-up says this likely hid it from most other telescopes. Finding it took both Rubin’s repeated imaging and software built to link scattered faint detections. We covered a similar story of patient, data-driven discovery in our earlier piece on a possible hidden pair of supermassive black holes.

    How big is it, really?

    The headline estimate is 600 to 1,500 kilometers across. That would put ED138 anywhere from a modest icy world, smaller than Ceres, up to one comparable to the dwarf planet Makemake, which is about 1,430 km wide according to The Planetary Society. Jurić has put the best guess near 1,000 km and, as Gizmodo reports, called it the largest trans-Neptunian object found in about 20 years. Those figures remain estimates.

    Bar chart comparing the estimated 600 to 1,500 km size of 2026 ED138 with Ceres, Makemake, Eris and Pluto
    Estimated size of 2026 ED138 compared with known dwarf planets. Sources: UW News, Space.com, Gizmodo (ED138 estimate); The Planetary Society (others).

    Why such a wide range? Telescopes see reflected sunlight, and how much light arrives depends on two things at once: how big the object is and how reflective its surface is (its albedo). A small, shiny body and a large, dark body can look equally bright from far away. The team estimated size from distance, brightness and an assumed surface reflectivity, so the range mostly reflects uncertainty about that reflectivity. A 2.5-fold gap in diameter corresponds to roughly a six-fold gap in albedo.

    Schematic of a small reflective body and a large dark body appearing equally bright
    Schematic: the same brightness can come from a small, reflective object or a large, dark one. Created by Xsciens.

    What counts as a dwarf planet

    NASA summarizes the International Astronomical Union’s definition: a dwarf planet orbits the Sun, is massive enough for its own gravity to pull it into a nearly round shape, has not cleared the neighborhood around its orbit, and is not a moon. Five objects are recognized today: Ceres, Pluto, Eris, Haumea and Makemake. If ED138 is confirmed to meet the criteria and is formally recognized, it would be the sixth.

    Roundness is why size matters so much. The University of Washington’s write-up notes that icy bodies of this scale are expected to be round, but nobody has yet observed ED138 well enough to see its shape. Until its diameter and shape are measured, “candidate” is the accurate word.

    What happens next

    Follow-up work will aim to pin down the size. Space.com reports that this requires infrared observations, naming the James Webb Space Telescope, because an object’s heat emission helps separate its size from its reflectivity. Meanwhile, Rubin’s ten-year survey of the southern sky, which began in June 2026, continues, and searches of older images — “precovery,” in Jurić’s term, meaning finding an object in images taken before anyone recognized it — may turn up more objects earlier surveys missed.

    In the coverage we checked, no peer-reviewed paper accompanies the announcement, so the numbers above should be read as the team’s preliminary estimates.

    Xsciens Editorial Note

    This is a candidate, not a confirmed dwarf planet: its orbit is calculated from about a decade of positions, but its size is still an estimate.

    • Observed versus calculated. What astronomers recorded directly were positions and brightness in many images. The distance (about 46 au) and the orbital tilt (about 25°) are calculated from them, and the 600–1,500 km diameter is a further estimate that also assumes how reflective the surface is, which is why the range spans a factor of 2.5.
    • Limits. Roundness has not been observed, and the coverage we reviewed cites no peer-reviewed paper. This note rests on the announcement and secondary coverage; we could not open the NOIRLab release itself. “Hot classical” is Universe Today’s description, for a category of Kuiper belt objects defined by widely tilted orbits.
    • What to watch. Infrared measurements of its size, for which Space.com points to the James Webb Space Telescope, and whether the object is formally recognized as a dwarf planet.
    • From the editors — the solar-system poster on a classroom wall may soon need a new line. If Rubin keeps scanning the southern sky for ten years, more faint worlds could plausibly turn up, ones that hid in crowded star fields or slipped between older surveys. The catch is that “candidate” is the operative word, and until the size is measured the headline number could move a lot. So treat 1,000 km as a placeholder, and look again when the infrared measurements arrive.

    References for this note: NASA, What is a planet?, Müller et al., Trans-Neptunian objects and Centaurs at thermal wavelengths (arXiv), Petit et al., Canada-France Ecliptic Plane Survey (arXiv)

    Sources: University of Washington News, Space.com, Universe Today, Gizmodo, The Planetary Society

  • Two Supermassive Black Holes May Be Closing In on a Merger — We Might Watch the Approach

    Two Supermassive Black Holes May Be Closing In on a Merger — We Might Watch the Approach

    Astronomers have found evidence of a second, previously hidden jet at the center of a galaxy called Markarian 501 — a sign, they argue, that the galaxy’s known supermassive black hole has a close companion, locked in an orbit lasting only about four months. If that binary interpretation holds up, the pair would be among the closest candidate supermassive black hole pairs ever identified, and under some assumptions could merge within roughly a century, giving astronomers an unusually good opportunity to track the late stages of a process that shapes how galaxies grow.

    原論文情報 / Original Paper
    Title: Detection of a second jet within the nuclear core of Mrk 501
    Authors: S. Britzen et al.
    Journal: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS)
    DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stag291

    A Jet That Shouldn’t Be There

    Markarian 501, a galaxy about 450 million light-years away in the constellation Hercules, has been a familiar target for radio astronomers for decades. It belongs to a class of galaxies called blazars, whose central black hole fires a narrow jet of energetic particles and radiation almost directly at Earth, making the galaxy unusually bright at radio and gamma-ray wavelengths. That single jet is what astronomers had always used to study the galaxy’s core.

    A team led by Silke Britzen at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy (MPIfR) in Bonn, Germany, re-examined archival radio images and found a second, fainter jet-like feature, appearing on the opposite side of the core from the known jet and curving around it from image to image. Because it was faint and positioned differently from the familiar jet, it had gone unremarked in earlier studies of the galaxy.

    Twelve Years of Radio Snapshots

    To check whether the second jet was real rather than an imaging artifact, the team reanalyzed 83 Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA) observations at 43 gigahertz, taken between September 2011 and July 2023 — a US-wide network of radio dishes that, combined, works like a single extremely high-resolution telescope. They compared these with earlier Mrk 501 observations at 15 and 8 gigahertz, extending the galaxy’s radio monitoring history back further still.

    Across the 83 snapshots, the second feature kept reappearing in a shifted position, tracing a path that looked like it was sweeping around the core. Separately, the brightness of the galaxy’s central core rose and fell in a recurring pattern. Neither behavior is expected from a single, stable jet; both become easier to explain if a second massive object is orbiting the first and periodically disturbing the flow of material near the black hole.

    A Partial Ring in a 2022 Image

    One image, taken on June 24, 2022, offered an especially intriguing clue: a partial ring-like structure around the core, which the researchers interpret as a possible Einstein ring, a pattern that can appear when light from a background source is bent into a circle by the gravity of a massive foreground object. In this case, the proposed explanation is that light from the second jet was briefly bent around the main black hole as the two objects passed close to the same line of sight.

    The team treats the ring as supporting evidence rather than confirmation. The two candidate black holes sit far too close together, as seen from Earth, for any existing telescope — including the Event Horizon Telescope — to resolve them as two separate points of light, so no image has shown them individually side by side.

    Diagram of the Markarian 501 black hole pair, showing the roughly 121-day candidate orbit, separation, mass range, and estimated time to merger
    Source: created based on data from Britzen et al. 2026, MNRAS, and the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy.

    A Four-Month Orbit, Not Perfectly Pinned Down

    The two independent clues point to a similar, short rhythm, but not an identical one. Comparing images in which the second feature returned to a similar position gave a recurrence time of about 146 days, with sizeable uncertainty of plus or minus 22 days. The separate pattern in the core’s brightness pointed to a period closer to 121 days, though the researchers describe that figure as less securely measured. The paper adopts roughly 121 days as its working estimate for the orbital period, while noting the two measurements do not perfectly agree.

    For two supermassive black holes to complete an orbit in only about four months, they would have to be extraordinarily close together: for objects with roughly equal mass, the team estimates a separation of only 27 to 128 times the black hole’s own Schwarzschild radius — the characteristic size of a black hole’s event horizon — assuming each black hole weighs somewhere between 100 million and 1 billion times the Sun’s mass. Converted to more familiar units, the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy’s own announcement describes this as roughly 250 to 540 times the distance between Earth and the Sun, depending on the exact masses assumed.

    That is a strikingly small gap for two objects this massive. Many galaxies are thought to harbor black hole pairs left over from earlier galaxy mergers, which sink toward each other over millions of years but then stall at a particular separation — a long-standing puzzle known as the “final-parsec problem,” since theory alone has struggled to explain how such pairs lose enough orbital energy to close that last stretch of distance. A confirmed pair this close together would offer scientists a rare, concrete look at what that advanced stage actually looks like.

    A Possible Merger in About a Century

    Based on that tight separation, the researchers estimate that the binary’s orbit could shrink enough for the two black holes to merge on a timescale as short as roughly 100 years, under certain assumptions about their masses and mass ratio. That is not a firm countdown: it is a model-dependent estimate, and if the true masses sit toward the heavier end of the estimated range, the inferred merger timescale lengthens considerably.

    The researchers are careful to frame the whole result as an interpretation, not a settled fact. The paper’s language throughout is “appears to,” “is consistent with,” and “likely,” rather than “proven,” and it does not resolve the mismatch between the 121-day and 146-day period estimates. What is observed directly is the second jet-like feature, its shifting position, the brightness cycle, and the one-time ring; the orbiting-black-hole picture is the explanation the authors find best fits all of it together.

    A Chance to Track, Not Necessarily Witness

    If the binary interpretation is confirmed, Markarian 501 would become a valuable target for a very different kind of observation: gravitational waves. As two supermassive black holes spiral closer together, they are expected to emit extremely low-frequency gravitational waves — ripples in spacetime far too slow for ground-based detectors like LIGO, but potentially detectable by pulsar timing arrays (PTAs), which track tiny timing shifts in the ultra-regular radio pulses from rapidly spinning dead stars called pulsars.

    In 2023, several PTA collaborations, including the European Pulsar Timing Array, reported the first evidence of a faint background hum of gravitational waves, widely thought to come from the combined signal of many such black hole pairs across the universe, blurred together. Picking out a single, confirmed, well-characterized pair like the one proposed in Markarian 501 from that noisy background would be a demanding task, but the researchers see it as a genuine long-term possibility.

    “We may even see their frequency steadily rise as the two giants spiral toward collision, offering a rare chance to watch a supermassive black hole merger unfold,” said co-author Héctor Olivares.

    That prospect is what makes this finding more than a curiosity about one distant galaxy. Supermassive black hole mergers are thought to be common over cosmic history, but astronomers have never had a well-measured candidate this close to the final stage. Whether or not Markarian 501’s pair turns out to be real, the search for it is already pushing researchers to track changes in its jets, brightness, and possible gravitational-wave signal more closely, over the human-scale years and decades ahead.

    Sources: Max Planck Society, Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy, Britzen et al. 2026, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

  • [Science] Scientists Get Cancer Cells to Make Their Own Chemo Drug — Lab Tests Suggest a Way to Spare Healthy Tissue

    [Science] Scientists Get Cancer Cells to Make Their Own Chemo Drug — Lab Tests Suggest a Way to Spare Healthy Tissue

    Much of chemotherapy’s toll on the body comes from the fact that the drug attacks healthy, fast-dividing cells right along with cancerous ones. A team from RIKEN and Institute of Science Tokyo has developed a way around that: instead of administering an active drug, they deliver an inert precursor that only turns into a cancer-fighting compound once it is inside a cell, using carbon monoxide (CO) — a metabolite that runs elevated in some cancer cells — as the raw material. In effect, the cancer cell is enlisted to manufacture its own drug from a harmless precursor, while cells with lower CO output make far less of it. It’s an early-stage, cell-culture result rather than a ready-made treatment: the researchers themselves describe the selectivity they observed as modest, and animal or human safety data don’t yet exist.

    原論文情報 / Original Paper
    Title: Harnessing endogenous carbon monoxide for cancer-selective drug synthesis
    Authors: Kawai, M. et al.
    Journal: Nature Communications 17, 9603 (2026)
    DOI: 10.1038/s41467-026-77616-8

    A palladium catalyst smuggled in by the body’s own protein

    The team built what they call an albumin-palladium complex: a palladium catalyst tucked into a hydrophobic pocket of human serum albumin, the most abundant protein in blood. A small anchor molecule steers the complex to albumin’s drug-binding site, and this packaging keeps the catalyst active even in the presence of glutathione, an abundant cellular antioxidant that would normally deactivate a bare palladium compound. Once inside a cell, the complex reacts with intracellular CO to assemble a phenanthridinone-scaffold compound with topoisomerase-I-inhibiting activity — a mechanism shared with established anticancer drugs. The approach flips the usual order of drug delivery: rather than making a drug and shipping it to the cell, the team ships an inert precursor and lets the cell’s own CO serve as the building material for the final compound, assembled on site.

    Bar chart comparing CO-derived drug production across four cancer cell lines and one normal cell line
    Source: created from data in Kawai et al. (2026), Nature Communications 17, 9603

    Up to ninefold more compound formed in cancer cells

    According to the paper, after 48 hours in culture, the amount of CO-derived compound produced in four cancer cell lines — liver (HepG2), cervical (HeLa S3), breast (MCF7), and lung (A549) — was up to roughly ninefold higher than in normal fibroblasts (TIG3): 136 picomoles per million cells for the lung line versus 15 picomoles for the normal one. In the liver cancer line, the concentration needed to be effective (IC50) was 13.99 micromolar, about a third of the 37.54 micromolar needed against normal fibroblasts. In breast cancer cells, RIKEN’s release reports that treatment at 5 to 10 micromolar significantly suppressed colony formation over 12 days, with near-complete inhibition at 10 micromolar and above.

    After 48 hours, lung cancer cells used CO to synthesize roughly nine times as much of the drug compound as normal fibroblasts did.

    A new chemical angle on reducing chemotherapy’s toll

    The researchers frame this as an early step toward a broader drug-design strategy: using disease-specific metabolites, not just in cancer, as the raw material for synthesizing therapeutics inside the body rather than merely as diagnostic markers. The comparisons so far involve one cancer cell line and one normal cell line at a time, and the work is limited to cultured cells — animal and clinical studies still lie ahead. Still, it offers a new chemical approach to the long-standing challenge of designing cancer treatments that spare healthy tissue.

    The study was published on September 17, 2026, in Nature Communications.

    Xsciens editorial note: what the numbers do and do not show

    The most striking figure is the up to ninefold difference in how much compound the cells made, with lung cancer cells producing 136 picomoles against 15 picomoles in normal fibroblasts. But that is a measure of synthesis inside cells, not of tumor shrinkage. The effective concentration (IC50) in liver cancer cells, 13.99 micromolar versus 37.54 micromolar in normal fibroblasts, is about a third, so the selectivity in killing cells is real but more modest than the ninefold synthesis gap suggests.

    It is also worth noting how the idea differs from conventional targeted drugs. Those aim at a molecule on or in the cancer cell. Here, a harmless precursor is delivered first and the cancer cell’s own metabolism supplies carbon monoxide as a building block, so the strategy depends on how much CO a given tumor makes. The comparisons so far use single cell lines in culture, so how well this works in tumors made of mixed cells, and whether enough precursor can reach them, are open questions for animal and clinical studies.

    Key terms

    • Albumin: the most abundant protein in blood, here used as a carrier for the catalyst
    • Palladium complex: a compound of the metal palladium that acts as a catalyst, speeding up a chemical reaction
    • Glutathione: an antioxidant present in large amounts in cells that can deactivate many catalysts
    • Topoisomerase I inhibitor: a drug that blocks an enzyme cells need to copy DNA, a mechanism used by established anticancer drugs
    • IC50: the concentration of a compound needed to reduce cell growth by half

    Sources: RIKEN, Kawai et al., Nature Communications 17, 9603 (2026), Tech & Bio Life Sciences